Internet Explorer 6 is no longer supported. Please upgrade for an optimal browsing experience.

FOCUS BRIEF

  • 1
    1
    1
    1
    1
    (6)
  • 7 comments
  •  
  • share
  • print
The Top 10 Leadership Qualities
ANALYSIS BY:
David Hakala
PUBLISHED:
May 26 2009
AUDIENCE:
CEOs, department managers, business executives
KEYWORDS:
RESEARCH CENTERS HUMAN RESOURCES HR RECRUITMENT

Introduction

 

Leadership can be defined as one's ability to get others to willingly follow. Every organization needs leaders at every level. Leaders can be found and nurtured if you look for the following character traits.

A leader with vision has a clear, vivid picture of where to go, as well as a firm grasp on what success looks like and how to achieve it. But it’s not enough to have a vision; leaders must also share it and act upon it. Jack Welch, former chairman and CEO of General Electric Co., said, "Good business leaders create a vision, articulate the vision, passionately own the vision and relentlessly drive it to completion."

A leader must be able to communicate his or her vision in terms that cause followers to buy into it. He or she must communicate clearly and passionately, as passion is contagious.

A good leader must have the discipline to work toward his or her vision single-mindedly, as well as to direct his or her actions and those of the team toward the goal. Action is the mark of a leader. A leader does not suffer “analysis paralysis” but is always doing something in pursuit of the vision, inspiring others to do the same.

 

Analysis



Integrity is the integration of outward actions and inner values. A person of integrity is the same on the outside and on the inside. Such an individual can be trusted because he or she never veers from inner values, even when it might be expeditious to do so. A leader must have the trust of followers and therefore must display integrity.

Honest dealings, predictable reactions, well-controlled emotions, and an absence of tantrums and harsh outbursts are all signs of integrity. A leader who is centered in integrity will be more approachable by followers.

Dedication means spending whatever time or energy is necessary to accomplish the task at hand. A leader inspires dedication by example, doing whatever it takes to complete the next step toward the vision. By setting an excellent example, leaders can show followers that there are no nine-to-five jobs on the team, only opportunities to achieve something great.

Magnanimity means giving credit where it is due. A magnanimous leader ensures that credit for successes is spread as widely as possible throughout the company. Conversely, a good leader takes personal responsibility for failures. This sort of reverse magnanimity helps other people feel good about themselves and draws the team closer together. To spread the fame and take the blame is a hallmark of effective leadership.

Leaders with humility recognize that they are no better or worse than other members of the team. A humble leader is not self-effacing but rather tries to elevate everyone. Leaders with humility also understand that their status does not make them a god. Mahatma Gandhi is a role model for Indian leaders, and he pursued a “follower-centric” leadership role.

Openness means being able to listen to new ideas, even if they do not conform to the usual way of thinking. Good leaders are able to suspend judgment while listening to others’ ideas, as well as accept new ways of doing things that someone else thought of. Openness builds mutual respect and trust between leaders and followers, and it also keeps the team well supplied with new ideas that can further its vision.

Creativity is the ability to think differently, to get outside of the box that constrains solutions. Creativity gives leaders the ability to see things that others have not seen and thus lead followers in new directions. The most important question that a leader can ask is, “What if … ?” Possibly the worst thing a leader can say is, “I know this is a dumb question ... ”

Fairness means dealing with others consistently and justly. A leader must check all the facts and hear everyone out before passing judgment. He or she must avoid leaping to conclusions based on incomplete evidence. When people feel they that are being treated fairly, they reward a leader with loyalty and dedication.

Assertiveness is not the same as aggressiveness. Rather, it is the ability to clearly state what one expects so that there will be no misunderstandings. A leader must be assertive to get the desired results. Along with assertiveness comes the responsibility to clearly understand what followers expect from their leader.

Many leaders have difficulty striking the right amount of assertiveness, according to a study in the February 2007 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, published by the APA (American Psychological Association). It seems that being underassertive or overassertive may be the most common weakness among aspiring leaders.

A sense of humor is vital to relieve tension and boredom, as well as to defuse hostility. Effective leaders know how to use humor to energize followers. Humor is a form of power that provides some control over the work environment. And simply put, humor fosters good camaraderie.

Intrinsic traits such as intelligence, good looks, height and so on are not necessary to become a leader. Anyone can cultivate the proper leadership traits.

The original source of this article is HRWorld.com, part of the Focus network of sites.

Was this article helpful? Rate it:
1
1
1
1
1
(6)

7 Comments

Add a comment

Posted on May 27, 2009

Great article!

Posted on June 12, 2009
Tim

Must read for every politician.

Posted on Dec. 10, 2009

David defines leadership as follows: "Leadership can be defined as one's ability to get others to willingly follow." This is fine as far as it goes, but like most who think about leadership, David talks only about influencing people who report to the leader. Hence leadership influence is really meant to be applied downward. I think leadership can be shown upward and sideways as well whenever colleagues influence each other by showing a better way, which can be done either by example of by overtly promoting a new direction.

Another point worth thinking about is this: if leadership is genuinely an influence process, then how are we to classify decision making, such as when the person in charge makes a strategic decision? For me, this is management. Leadership must be restricted to influence. Otherwise we have no way of accounting for bottom-up leadership where the person showing it has no authority to decide for the people being influenced (led).

Interestingly, showing leadership upward doesn't require many of the qualities David talks about. You only need to be fair, for example, if you have responsibility for people. Leadership shown upwards works if the target audience is influenced and this can be done with a presentation of hard evidence if it is convincing enough. A technical geek with poor emotional intelligence might develop a new product, say an iPhone killer, and promote it to management in an aggressive or blunt manner but still show leadership if management buys his proposal.

Posted on March 18, 2010
jefferson

lahat ng pinaka mgandang qualities ay nasa america

Posted on March 18, 2010
jefferson

avid defines leadership as follows: "Leadership can be defined as one's ability to get others to willingly follow." This is fine as far as it goes, but like most who think about leadership, David talks only about influencing people who report to the leader. Hence leadership influence is really meant to be applied downward. I think leadership can be shown upward and sideways as well whenever colleagues influence each other by showing a better way, which can be done either by example of by overtly promoting a new direction.
Another point worth thinking about is this: if leadership is genuinely an influence process, then how are we to classify decision making, such as when the person in charge makes a strategic decision? For me, this is management. Leadership must be restricted to influence. Otherwise we have no way of accounting for bottom-up leadership where the person showing it has no authority to decide for the people being influenced (led).
Interestingly, showing leadership upward doesn't require many of the qualities David talks about. You only need to be fair, for example, if you have responsibility for people. Leadership shown upwards works if the target audience is influenced and this can be done with a presentation of hard evidence if it is convincing enough. A technical geek with poor emotional intelligence might develop a new product, say an iPhone killer, and promote it to management in an aggressive or blunt manner but still show leadership if management buys his proposal.

Posted on March 18, 2010
jefferson quesada

avid defines leadership as follows: "Leadership can be defined as one's ability to get others to willingly follow." This is fine as far as it goes, but like most who think about leadership, David talks only about influencing people who report to the leader. Hence leadership influence is really meant to be applied downward. I think leadership can be shown upward and sideways as well whenever colleagues influence each other by showing a better way, which can be done either by example of by overtly promoting a new direction.
Another point worth thinking about is this: if leadership is genuinely an influence process, then how are we to classify decision making, such as when the person in charge makes a strategic decision? For me, this is management. Leadership must be restricted to influence. Otherwise we have no way of accounting for bottom-up leadership where the person showing it has no authority to decide for the people being influenced (led).
Interestingly, showing leadership upward doesn't require many of the qualities David talks about. You only need to be fair, for example, if you have responsibility for people. Leadership shown upwards works if the target audience is influenced and this can be done with a presentation of hard evidence if it is convincing enough. A technical geek with poor emotional intelligence might develop a new product, say an iPhone killer, and promote it to management in an aggressive or blunt manner but still show leadership if management buys his proposal.

Posted on Aug. 13, 2010
boston

hey i think its cool

Add a comment

*  
*  

Focus reserves the right to delete inappropriate comments. Please see our Terms & Conditions to learn more.

* required
Follow Focus

BEST OF FOCUS RESEARCH

Check out the research that readers are downloading most often.

2010 Enterprise Phone Systems Comparison Guide

Updated for 2010! Take the guesswork out of selecting an enterprise-class phone system with our comprehensive Comparison Guide.

See more about Phone Systems

Cisco vs. ShoreTel: Who Really Delivers Value for Large Enterprise Companies?

Get the side-by-side comparison of industry’s leading Enterprise PBX solutions and vendors. Our Focus product specialists evaluated big players, like Cisco Systems and ShoreTel, across various feature categories.

See more about Phone Systems

2010 Enterprise Phone Systems Buyer’s Guide

Our updated Buyer’s Guide will help you fully understand both your business phone system needs as well as the purchase process.

See more about Phone Systems

Focus Newsletter
Get the latest research and advice from
Focus delivered right to your inbox.