Share what you know with millions of people

Focus is the best place to turn what you know into remarkable content
×
0

Career Path Challenges for Specialists Within Service Organisations

Introduction

One of the biggest challenges that organisations face today is providing a structured career path for their specialist employees. In the majority of companies today, technicians, engineers and specialists can only achieve an increase in remuneration through promotion. Such promotions are usually within the larger structure of the company and will force a move into people management. Unless the employee has made the conscious decision to switch from a technical role to a people management role such promotions will not benefit the company or the employee.

 

In many instances the specialist employee who has been promoted into a team leader or management role without the real commitment to do so, carries on with their technical role as before, spending little time on their management tasks. This creates a stressful climate within the team where employees feel that their manager does not really care about their development and performance. Newly promoted managers feel estranged from the management community whilst at the same time losing touch with their technical roots. Without a huge amount of support for the newly promoted manager this situation can lead to a drop in team performance and a lowering of morale. In customer facing roles this could be the difference between providing adequate and great service.

Strategies

So can this problem be resolved. The answer is a definite yes but it does require a change from the traditional one size fits all HR practice. Highly skilled & specialist resources are a scarce commodity within the marketplace so moving such an employee into a non-technical role when this is not their chosen path makes no sense. It is clear then that a Specialists Career Path needs to be put in place that recognises and remunerates employees in a different way from following the traditional management route. A Specialists Career Path needs to be set up to run alongside the management route so that employees are able to move between paths and have a clear understanding of what they need to do in order to achieve this. 

The key principle with any career path is that it fits the requirements of the organisation and does not exist for its own sake.

As stated before the structure of the Specialist Career Path is dependent on the organisational requirements of each individual business but the basic principles apply. The term Specialists covers a broad range of people but an easy definition is that it is a group which has a very narrow focus and that form the core of your business propositions. 

If we take a fairly standard example of how this could work in an IT department today this should provide some clarity of how potential structures operate.

Database Administrators are an excellent example. At the intake and training level employees would be expected to provide some first line support and be involved in maintenance tasks. As their skill level increases then the next move would be to provide second line support and some design work related to ongoing maintenance. The next step would be to provide third line support with a higher degree of design work. At this level the employee in question would be expected to be a Mentor to the intake and training level employees and be part of virtual teams dealing with capacity planning. The next level up would be considered as the ‘Guru’ level and the employee in this role would be accountable for all aspects of the technical aspects of the Database Design and Operation. Alongside this structure would be the appropriate levels of people management expertise who would deal with all the day to day aspects of keeping a department working. 

This example is for IT folks, but is equally valid for Accountants, Recruitment Specialists, HR Operations and Customer Service departments  etc etc.

 

The Importance of Having Mentors

 

A potential problem is how to measure the skill sets of the employees in their individual areas. However, if the criteria are set correctly within the levels it will be more straightforward to have a view of employees’ relative skills and capability. The most important aspect of this is to have an effective Mentoring culture in place so that careers can be developed and any skill gaps identified and addressed. This will provide consistent monitoring and once a role becomes available the technical eligibility of the employee for that role should not be in doubt. Consideration must also be given to the fact that Products & Services move on at some speed so direction and strategy needs to be reviewed at regular intervals and this will make any measurement fairly fluid. It is really important therefore that the employees who are in the top roles across all disciplines have the skills and capability to set and revise criteria in line with business objectives.

 

The Soft Side of Life

 

Soft skills also have a major part to play, as previously mentioned the ‘Guru’ level employees need to have and an excellent mix of both technical and business skills. The ideal ratio again depends on the individual organisation but taking the previous example of a Database Admin team the following table shows an example of how this could be applied in real life:

 

 

Role
Technical Skill Level
Weighting
Business Skill Level
Weighting
Guru
4
50%
3
50%
Senior DBA
3
60%
2
40%
DBA
2
70%
1
30%
1st Line Support
1
70%
1
30%

 

 

 

Give me some Training and Recognition

 

External recognition is also important for any skilled community and should be encouraged as a major part of employee development. It goes without saying that any training plan should meet a business requirement but support should be given where practical to enable employees to obtain new skills in line with their personal development plan. Training plans for specific areas should be set by the ‘Guru’ of that discipline to ensure consistent and appropriate courses are undertaken.

However, there should be element of direction through personal development plans for determining the career path. Many businesses are accredited with organisations such as the Institute of Engineering and Technology and the British Computing Society and employees who wish to seek either Chartered Engineer or Chartered IT Professional status should be supported. Opposition to external recognition consists of the fear that skilled resource will leave the organisation. However, this should not be viewed as a bad thing. If an employee is unhappy at his level and is looking to move on then the time is right to call it a day, and part on amicable terms. Being accredited as something like a Chartered Engineer will certainly help in this instance.

Conclusion

In summary then here are the five main points that should help retain and grow talent within any specialist organisation. 

  • Don’t promote experts to Management and Administration roles in order to give them a pay raise if this is not their chosen path
  • As a business you have to know what you want from your specialist skilled teams
  • Create a Specialist Career Path structure across the whole organisation and apply it consistently
  • Get the right people in at the ‘Guru’ level. This is critical
  • Get some external recognition
Disclosures and References

White paper written by me and under copyright of Red Arc Consulting Ltd of which I am the Managing Director. 

2
benbree
Posted on May 2, 2010

I think there are three attributes to one’s career as a specialist – money, skills, and company. The best model I find for this and one that I think IT might consider is that of a legal practice. While my only experience in this is what I see on TV, I think the evolution of IT is outside of the corporate walls. That is, corporations purchase the best firm to provide their IT services. These firms work with organizations to provide an unlimited set of IT services and hire specialists, who fill roles in various practices (enterprise architecture, data warehousing, enterprise monitoring, enterprise resource management, customer relationship management, business process management, and others). This way, the specialists work in areas they understand, with managers who understand them, with the goal of building the business and their personal wealth through billable customer hours solving problems and providing solutions.
The challenge I find today is that many sharp technology folks must focus on satisfying not only the customer but also a sales force motivated by their personal quotas. Rarely is this success of the sales force passed to the developers and presales professionals. In corporations, IT folks find an even dimmer role – they solve problems for the company that make money but there is no return for their effort.
While I have not worked out all of the details, I think skilled IT professionals considering their futures might consider a consultative model that provides services for many companies. I find most corporations need the best IT staff but do not wish to pay the premium price to get those services. I think IT specialist should consider a path similar to one chosen by lawyers. There is a practice with a number of specialists to handle any client need. What do you think?

1
Richard Curtis
Business IT Advisor, Red Arc Consulting Limited

Here are my views on Helen's questions and I would be interested in hearing other thoughts and views on this

1) The best way to address this is via a Personal Development Plan which can be linked to steps in the Career Path. I also think it's essential that employees are engaged in developing the Career Path if it doesn't exist and have a stake in Continuous Improvement thereafter.

The ROI should hopefully come from having a well trained competent member of the team who is adding value throughout and whatever resources are put in should be paid back easily

2) Needs and wants from the specialist teams should be defined by Job Families and linked to Strategy.

3) You could use external guidelines from bodies such as the Institute of Engineering and Technology to help you with defining the technical areas of expertise but the soft skills side will be more difficult to define. You will probably find though that a Person Profile exists somewhere and this can be adapted for the Soft Skills piece.

4) Guru's usually ID themselves and become evident by their behaviour. From a technical perspective they can be nurtured by being given the time to keep up to date with their discipline and not being utilised 100%. Being able to keep up to date is key.

5) It's worth checking out the IET website to look at their Accreditations and Career Manager pages.

I forgot the fun bit, but it is the most important aspect of a career by far.

0
Helen Lau Running
Non-IT Staff, NARBHA
  • Recommended by:

1) What suggestions do you folks have for filtering experts in Mgmt/Admin to assist them and the org to identify their path within the organization? ... and what can you do to make them feel vested with the org and encourage them, the workers, want them to sign up and stay the course? ... from the org's POV also, not to lose access to 1) the valuable resource of this brain bank 2) and what of the ROI? = the org not doomed to lose access to a think tank 'brain drain' to which it may have contributed its resources?.
2) How do you identify needs and wants from the specialist skilled teams?
3) Are there guidelines for creating 'specialist career path' for the folks?
4)How do you create a 'GURU' ... what special criteria are there that are necessary? ... eg perhaps the org can help gurus id themselves - another consideration - perhaps the organizaztion can nurture 'a batch' of gurus?
5) External recogition - how to DO this? Cite some specific examples to illustrate.

Thank you ... I wanted to reciprocate and BE a 'healthy' participant.
from HLR in FlgAz USA planet EARTH! ... and have FUN on the job too! .. sonrisas = smiles H

0
Nik Kellingley
HR, Training and Development Consultant, Self-Employed
Posted on May 1, 2010
  • Recommended by:

Great paper Richard, genuinely interesting with some decent insights too.

I agree that organisations fail to recognise specialists in areas properly without giving them a bump to a managerial role that they are often poorly suited to.

0
Xale
Posted on Nov. 5, 2010
  • Recommended by:

I need sample , On-The-Job-Training for Human capital development specialist

Answer This Question