Share what you know with millions of people

Focus is the best place to turn what you know into remarkable content
×
1

Lessons from ERP Implementation Failures

Introduction

 

ERP implementation failures inflict a great deal of pain on organizations. Whether it’s implementation cost overruns, software that doesn’t support the business, or lack of employee acceptance, ERP failures entail very negative consequences. So why do over 65% of enterprise software implementations fail?

 

Analysis

Our experience helping clients clean up projects they or their software vendors have failed to manage, along with our expert witness support to ERP lawsuits, has taught us quite a bit about the reasons for ERP failure. Below are five trends we see in most troubled enterprise software implementations: 

  1. Lack of software fit. The first stumbling block for many failed implementations is a severe misalignment between software functionality and business needs. There are hundreds of enterprise software options in the marketplace, so it is important to navigate carefully and find the product with the right fit. Too many failed implementations neglected to engage in an effective ERP software selection process.
  2. Unrealistic implementation expectations. Enterprise software sales reps often understate the level of resources required to make the implementation successful, so many companies fail to budget adequate time, money, resources, and external consulting support to make the project successful. In addition, failed implementations often neglect to include key activities in their implementation project plan, such as organizational change management, business process and workflow definition, and thorough conference room pilots.
  3. Lack of executive buy-in and support. Executive buy-in involves more than signing the checks and delegating the implementation to a project team. It involves defining clear implementation objectives, establishing project governance, and making tough decisions when needed. This is arguably the most important, because it directly affects the other four failure points.
  4. Propensity to customize software rather than leverage standard functionality. Nearly every failed implementation I have seen suffers from this problem, and it is often because of a failure to select the right software in the first place (see #1 above). The more you customize the software, the longer it’s going to take to implement, the more it’s going to cost, and the more risk you introduce into the project. It’s typically not realistic to completely abstain from customization, but changes to the software should be devoted only to key areas of competitive advantage or differentiators. If you aren’t able to limit customization to those areas, then you should either find another ERP software solution or back up and rethink your strategy.
  5. Lack of ERP implementation expertise. Implementations are tough and a team with tested battle wounds is going to dramatically increase your likelihood of success. As we often tell our clients, the fastest and cheapest way to implement enterprise software is to do it right the first time. Failed implementations are more likely to have inexperienced team members who don’t know enough to know what they don’t know.

 

Conclusion

If you see one or more of these patterns emerging during your implementation, then you are putting your organization at severe risk. On the other hand, If your implementation project team is able to avoid these five common pitfalls, you will be well on your way to a successful ERP implementation.

1
Michael Krigsman
CEO, Asuret Inc.
Posted on June 10, 2010
  • Recommended by:

There's no question that ERP buyers tend to underestimate the extent that non-technical factors affect implementation. It's easy to overlooking the change management aspects of ERP because so much effort and attention is focused on evaluating and purchasing software.

That said, your Brief is absolutely correct to point out that change-related issues are by the far the largest determinant of ERP implementation success.

In general, the likelihood of success increases when the project is kept as simple and straightforward as possible. Ensure management commitment, engage with stakeholders and users, and avoid custom code are great first steps to avoiding implementation failure.

0
Jeetender khosla
Posted on Oct. 15, 2010
  • Recommended by:

In case SAP India is not able to win the deal, they adopt all corrupt practices as mentioned in www.visfot.com

0
Robert A. Marchello
CEO and Managing Member, Marchello Consulting Group, LLC
Posted on Nov. 18, 2010
  • Recommended by:

Eric, you make several good points in this brief, well done. The two that really resonate with me are the Executive buy-in and Customization. If you cannot get the leadership team 100% behind the project then it is destine to fail from the beginning. I would put the failure rate well above 65% in that case. On the other hand if the Executive team is full vested and stands behind the implementation team, then the organization's chance of success is far greater.

Customization is a very volatile area because if you do not fit the product to your needs it will fall short of expectations; however, as you pointed out, if you spend too much time customizing then the project costs will increase and probability of a successful launch will decrease. There is a very fine balance between out of box functionality and the need to customize to some extent. I strongly believe that at least 80% of the functionality that is sought must be inherent in the system, leaving the other 20% open for customizing as needed.

0
Setiadji Sunarsan
Posted on Dec. 31, 2010
  • Recommended by:

The Brief by Eric is very concise yet covering all the most critical success factors.

I would just like to add another often-overlooked factor, i.e. lost f focus/vision on the complete benefits of ERP.

Many ERP implementation projects became a painstaking effort in automating the integrated processes affecting the whole organization and causing the real objectives/benefits to be obtained by (possibly several waves of) ERP implementation project to be overshadowed by the pains. The resources involved in ERP implementation projects become fatigue when the benefits of ERP have not been fully realized. The subsequent new people in the ERP team don't inherit the same motivation to keep on generating the ERP benefits.

So, it is also very important that the senior management/executives of the companies implementing ERP set out the right visions and roadmaps upfront in the beginning of ERP implementation. These visions must then be propagated to the whole organization for the right buy-in and support from the workforce in all layers of the organization.

Answer This Question