Share what you know with millions of people

Focus is the best place to turn what you know into remarkable content
×
0

34% of Americans over the age of 20 are obese. Should the workplace play a role in fixing this?

According to the October Edition of SHRM's HRMagazine, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discovered that two-thirds of all American's over the age of 20 are overweight. "In 1960, one of two Americans worked in jobs that required them to be physically active. Now only one in five US workers expend a high level of energy at work." What is the workplace's obligation - if any - for addressing this problem? How do we do it?

Attachments

2
Brenda Lewis
Director of Human Resources, Greenbelt Homes, Inc.
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011

I have not met an obese person who was not aware that they needed to lose weight -- and most of us are forever trying. Fun competitions are great for health and for motivation. Constantly pointing out the obvious, however, will not help anybody modify eating and exercise behaviors -- and could add to an already stressful situation. Now please pass me a candy bar.

1
Matt Bertuzzi
Marketing/Ops, The Bridge Group
Posted on Oct. 28, 2011

I wouldn't say it's an obligation, but it definitely an opportunity (non-obese people are generally happier, healthier & less costly). Especially with the research around the contagiousness of obesity.

I love this example (http://www.shapeupri.org/) of how competition + social can be used to take steps towards improved health. Interested to hear what others think.

1
Erik Goldoff
IT Systems & Security consultant, Goldoff Consulting
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011

I don't think the workplace should 'enforce' a program to reduce obesity, nor use penalties as motivation. I do think, however, that with increased helath care costs, they could/should provide incentive for healthy behavior that would limit obesity risks.

1
Ira Wolfe
President/Author, Success Performance Solutions
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011

Business may not be obligated morally but finanically I'd say it's critical. First of all, many skilled workers are obese. Companies can't afford to lose them to disability, illness, or attrition. But it's also ironically fairer to all employees if comnpanies reduce obesity in the workplace. I have a post in my blog queue for later this week with 13 stats and facts about obesity. Here's a preview - after reviewing them, it's pretty obivous employers must do something even if it's not an obligation.

1. One in three U.S. adults is obese.
2. If the current trajectory continues, 50% of the population will be obese by 2030.
3. More than 60% of the United States population is overweight or obese.
4. $1,000 to $6,000 in added cost per year for each obese employee.
5. Total cost of obesity to U.S. employers — including lost productivity — at $73 billion a year.
6. Nearly 10 percent of U.S. corporate health care costs are due to obesity and its complications.
7. The overall, tangible, annual costs of being obese are $4,879 for an obese woman and $2,646 for an obese man.
8. The overall annual costs of being overweight are $524 and $432 for women and men, respectively.
9. The health care costs for a morbidly obese person are $2,845 higher per year than the health care costs for a normal-weight person.
10. Average annualized costs, including value of lost life, are $8,365 for obese women and $6,518 for obese men.
11. Obese employees are more likely to be absent from work as a result of illness or injury than normal-weight employees.
12. An overweight employee had a 26% increase in risk of a short-term disability event in comparison to a normal-weight employee. In comparison to a normal-weight employee, an obese employee had a 76% increase in risk of a short-term disability event.
13. Nearly 1 billion additional gallons of fuel are consumed annually because of average-passenger weight increases since 1960. Annually, it is estimated that for every additional pound of weight for all car passengers, an additional 39.2 million gallons of fuel are consumed.

Sources:

A Heavy Burden: The Individual Costs of Being Overweight and Obese in the United States
Workplaces Feel The Impact of Obesity (NPR)

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

Pretty obvious some of these numbers are made up.
7&8: tangible costs higher than actual costs? And 10. "average anualized cost?
13.? Average passenger vehicle between 1960 and 2010 lost 1000 lb and gained 1500 lb. and doubled mpg, tripled commute time and distance. Average 2010 4000 lb car has 1% mpg change for 10% (400 lb) weight add which is from carpooling statistics.
I've seen similar numbers that turned out to "selectively sampled" and not adjusted for age.

Before touting Nutrition answer 1. why overweight people often eat less than normal weight people and 2. why does the human liver send neurotransmitters to the human pleasure center in proportion to the saturated fat in a meal?

0
Ira Wolfe
Ira Wolfe Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

@ Stephen. Excellent points. Genetics do have significant influence. And some of the facts may be headline influenced to make a point. But regardless of the cause, obesity still costs money and lives. And for those that don't have genetic tags, who is responsbile for the consequences of an unhealthy lifestyle? It seems to fall back on private paying citizens, insurance paying employers, and the government. Even when hosptials eat the cost, they just make it by raising fees on those who pay. And in the workplace, disabilities, absences, and associated costs do impact other employees and employer's bottom line.

1
Mark Herbert
Principal, New Paradigms LLC
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011

Charlie,
My research indicates that highly effective health management/wellness strategies contain five elements:
- Education about the causes of health issues
- Nutrition and better eating habits
- Excercise and movement
-Ongoing communication and intrinsic reinforcement and motivation
- Financial incentives

60%+ of health issues and their related costs come back to lifestyle (they are preventable). Obesity is a big one that affects a lot of underlying conditions.
We spend trillions from the costs of not addressing these issues proactively and we pay that out both directly in health care expenditures and indirectly from depression and other issues.
Employers can play a key role in addressing at least 3 of the 5 criteria. Why would we not invest in the health of our employees and address something that impacts our competiveness and profitability?

1
Tamara Field
President, Press8 Telecom LP
Posted on Nov. 1, 2011

I think that if you are a business owner and you truly care about your employees, you should offer some healthy alternatives to your employees. At the last company I owned, we had organic fruits delivered to our office once a week, replaced free pop with free fruit juices and purchased granola bars for employees free of cost. Our employees had a hard time with it at first since we used to offer free pop, but if we are offering these things for free I wanted to feel good about what we are offering to our employees. I consider our employees like family and I wouldn't want to give my family junk food and sugar laden cokes so why would I do that with my employees? Whenever I saw an employee walking around with an apple or a banana and fruit juice I felt good about our decision. And as an added bonus, it can potentially keep your companies health care costs down.

0
Kim Bryant, CPA
Certified Public Accountant, Bryant & Associates, P.C.
Posted on Oct. 28, 2011
  • Recommended by:

The workplace should not be "obligated" to have a role in helping to fix this. However, if the workplace can create incentives or some fun event/competition to help get employees to take steps towards losing weight and living a healthier live style, than it may help.

A few years ago, I had gain some weight due to some medical issues. I was shocked to learn that gaining about 25 pounds put me in the obese category. I knew I had weight to lose, but I didn't think I was obese! The fitness club I go to had Big Activity Challenge. We were judged on our diet, activity, weight loss change and BMI change. It was fun!

I just saw an article related to Americans being overweight and promised via my twitter post with the article to lose 10 pounds by the end of the year. But, we made this into a little office competition since everyone wants to lose some weight.

0
Paul Galvin
Principal SharePoint Architect, BrightStarr
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

I think they should do it for competitive purposes. Provide a really good program that is supportive and not punitive. I suspect that as people become more and more aware over time that being overweight is a terrible drag on your health (no pun intended) it will influence people's decision on where to work and how hard to work.

0
Art van Bodegraven
President, Van Bodegraven Associates
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

The workplace can play a huge - pun intended - role by considering the cost and performance implications of taking on new hires that present risks, of all kinds.

The enlightened workplace can do itself a lot of bottom line good by providing programs, incentives, whatever works in its universe, for incumbent employees to lead healthy life styles in a number of dimensions.

However, the responsibility is ultimately the individual's. And, no enterprise is obligated to provide educational or remedial programs. Nor is one obligated to take on undue risk in it's hiring practices.

Admittedly, this could present a slippery slope, but if drug use (legal and otherwise) is a disqualified and tobacco use is being upheld as a legitimate screening criterion, excess weight could be next.

0
Rob Luciano
Director of Business Development, Worldwide Panel (WWP)
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

Employers should be obligated to allow desk-bound (sedentary) employees to take short breaks for getting up for a walk or other appropriate exercise. In fact, employers should encourage healthy habits.

0
Mark Williams
Major Accounts Executive, Ricoh Americas Corporation
Posted on Nov. 1, 2011
  • Recommended by:

There shouldn't be an obligation but it would surely be a great asset. This is a practice in place for decades in the Far East and as a result they have fewer health problems and health related costs (i.e. health insurance, etc) have been cut dramatically..something this country would surely benefit from...but then our doctors are the most overpaid in the world...and some of them may have to cut back on their yacht expenses if this were implemented.

-1
Ron Kubitz
Recruiting/Training Manager, Brayman Construction Corp.
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

Should they have an obligation....no! DO they need to become involved in order to keep health care claims/costs from skyrocketing even further...yes!

Answer This Question