Share what you know with millions of people

Focus is the best place to turn what you know into remarkable content
×
0

E-mail Marketers: 'Don't be afraid to send too much e-mail' ...Agree or disagree?

I came across this claim in a quick summary of Hubspot's recent survey of over 9.5 billion emails on The Science of E-mail Marketing. "Don't be afraid to send too much e-mail" struck me as a curious finding both from an e-mail marketing "strategy" standpoint and from a consumer standpoint. Do you agree? Why or why not?

Attachments

3
Andrew Kordek
Chief Strategist and Co-Founder, Trendline Interactive
Posted on July 6, 2011

Sarah. Sarah. Sarah. Your preference for the amount of email you can consume is much different from me or other consumers. I am quite sure LS or Groupon or other daily deal senders struggle with a frequency issue as well.

Some people can tolerate 1 email a week and others can stomach 2-3 a day. It all boils down to how well targeted they are. Let me give you an example....I subscribe too the daily Business Insider which is powered by my colleagues at SailThru. They send me content based on my interests I gave as well as my behavior on the site. If they decided to send me 2 emails a day, I would love it since I know that pretty much everyone of the emails has something that I am interested in. Another case in point: I subscribe to Thrillist and UrbanDaddy and know that their content is right up my ally. I enjoy reading both emails and would not mind if they sent me more.

Sure..if I send you crappy, irrelevant emails that make no sense to you then less is more. However, if I send you something 1 or 2 times a day something that is completely targeted to your interests...something that adds value to your job or life, then I am quite sure people can tolerate it. This, coupled with a good opt-down and cadence choice to the subscriber is the key to increase frequency.

However...most companies can't or wont invest the time to get it right when it comes to email marketing. Some think that more is best and that everyone should have the same experience as the others...in that case then again, I agree with you that less is more.

Andrew Kordek
Co-Founder, Trendline Interactive
A Email Marketing Agency
Twitter: @andrewkordek & @trendlinei
Email: andrew@trendlineinteractive.com

1
Robin C Kennedy
CEO, Pro Reach
Posted on July 7, 2011

With Andrew (again) on the importance of relevance and engagement of the recipient with the sender.

IMO too much email is one of the primary causes of planners and revenue driven people not understanding the nature of email consumption.

A campaign did well?
Then send it every day.. or even 3 times a day...

To the same list?
Yes, they may have missed it... or it may have gone to junk....

Shall we change the creative?
If you have time...

It isn't doing well and more!
Then send it again, to more people, more often - eventually they will click.

In this case (exaggerated example, I would suggest you do not try this) it will definitely force a law of diminishing returns.

1
Michael A Brown
President, BtoBEngage
Posted on July 7, 2011

At a marketing conference last fall, a presenter stated, "Unless you are touching your contacts 24-36 times a quarter, you are under-marketing."

There was an audible gasp throughout the room. A woman stood up and responded, "That's not marketing ... that's stalking. That's harassment, plan and simple." Applause.

The e-mail outfits have a vested interest in "more is better." Conversely, we counsel our BtoB clients to take the radical approach of actually asking contacts when, how often, under what circumstances, and in which media they want to stay in touch. Customers seem to like that better than spam.

0
Andrew Kordek
Andrew Kordek Replied on July 7, 2011

Michael,

Please see my response to Amanda.

Andrew

0
Michael A Brown
Michael A Brown Replied on July 7, 2011

Thank you sir! However, two elements remain un-reconciled: cadence on whose terms? Absent prospect or customer preference, the perception of "too much" e-mail means the reality of "too much" e-mail.

Second, over-reliance on e-mail can result in under-application of other communication media, especially live interaction in-person or at least over the phone. Better to ride the entire stable, not only one horse.

0
Andrew Kordek
Andrew Kordek Replied on July 7, 2011

Totally agree on all points. I think that it varies from company to company and there is no "one size" fits all to anything email marketing these days. There needs to be careful consideration and planning for everything as well as true balance in efforts and channels.

Andrew

0
Sarah Gogin
CRM/VOIP Specialist, Focus
Posted on July 6, 2011

Disagree. Unless you work for Living Social Deals or Groupon, there is such a thing as “too many emails.” Being bombarded with email after email can be annoying, slightly creepy, aggravating, and essentially a turn off to a consumer. In my experience as a consumer, I expect a follow-up email after I register to receive information, but as soon as I start getting more than three emails thereafter I mark it as spam because it becomes too much of a hassle. In the case of email marketing, less is more.

0
Paulo Castro
Paulo Castro Replied on July 6, 2011

Sarah, I agree with you. First and most importantly for me is that if I did not ask for it, I do not want it. For example, I like to read and learn about adventure travel and outdoor activities all over the world, but I only want to read about it when my time for vacation is approaching. If I receive email about this topic when I am not even thinking about vacation, I delete it. It is essential for me to get the information when I need it - and I get to decide when that happens.

The second point is that email marketers are becoming excessively aggressive and will go to extremes to collect email addresses so they can target you for marketing. Many marketers definitely cross the line into the private affairs of individuals and businesses. For example, I bought an iPhone App to help me manage a schedule and dosage for medication I have to take for allergies. I began receiving emails within hours of my purchase, from e-marketers offering a myriad of products and services that ended up in my recycle bin.

Truthfully, I can't wait for the day when e-mail marketers will be afraid to send too much email.

0
  • Recommended by:

Constant emails to customers from companies that just repeat earlier emails are spam. They not only make me want to unsubscribe, it makes me not want to shop with them again either.

I only want to know about special offers or new stock and then only once per time. As a result this is all we send out to customers. Their email lists are too full of junk already for us to want to add to it. Sure way to lose customers.

The only people who tell you lots of email campaigns are good are the email marketing companies making money out of their services. I prefer to trust what customers tell us - fewer is better.

0
Andrew Kordek
Andrew Kordek Replied on July 7, 2011

Amanda,

I would not be so quick to generalize everyone in the email industry as folks who advise and encourage their customers to send more email. I have been involved in email marketing for 11 years now with 10 years client side experience running some of the most complex programs in the world. As a brand side marketer, there were times where I advised the company to dial back cadence and other times where I recommended that they increase frequency to the subscriber base.

As the Co-Founder of an email marketing agency, solely focused on email marketing and nothing more, I can say without doubt that I have advised clients to increase cadence as well as dramatically decrease it in certain areas. While I do make money if clients send more email, its about being a subscriber advocate and the ability to look beyond the money and understand what is the right balance for that particular audience. I am more interested in smarter email marketing, rather than more email marketing. Sometimes that might involve increased cadence and other times it might involved looking at email in a different light.

To say that fewer is better is an opinion of one and to generalize the folks involved in this industry as advocates for more email is simply not the right thing to do. To equate that same generalization, I could make the assumption that the reason you don't have an avatar or a profile filled out on focus means that you are hiding something, which of course would be the wrong thing to do.

Andrew Kordek
Co-Founder, Trendline Interactive
A Email Marketing Agency
Twitter: @andrewkordek & @trendlinei
Email: andrew@trendlineinteractive.com

Answer This Question