Share what you know with millions of people

Focus is the best place to turn what you know into remarkable content
×
0

Should sales reps use a pricing increase to create urgency to buy?

Anthony Iannarino wrote a blog post yesterday on this and I thought I would pose the question here. Is a price hike an effective way to get your prospect to buy? How do you create a sense of urgency in your buyers?

Attachments

1
Craig Elias
Creator of Trigger Event Selling, Shift Selling, Inc.
Posted on Sept. 3, 2011

I recently read a blog post "Should I Use a Pricing Increase to Create Urgency to Buy?" http://thesalesblog.com/2011/08/should-i-use-a-pricing-increase-to-create-urg...

I think he has a REALLY solid answer to this question.

Regards,

Craig

0
S. Anthony Iannarino
S. Anthony Iannarino Replied on Sept. 4, 2011

Thanks, Craig! I appreciate it!

0
Lauren Harper
Lauren Harper Replied on Sept. 6, 2011

Hi Craig! Thanks- that is actually the same article that I referenced in the body of my question!

0
Craig Elias
Craig Elias Replied on Sept. 7, 2011

Lauren, Thanks for pointing it out.

I saw the headline and having just read Anthony's post and liking what he had to say In my rushed effort to be of value I just added it.

That's what I get for working at 6:30AM on a Saturday.

Have a GREAT week!

0
Craig Elias
Craig Elias Replied on Sept. 7, 2011

P.S. From a formatting perspective it might make it easier for people to know hyperlinks exist by making sure they are underlined. I tried both Chrome and IE and neither one underlines the hyperlinks.

0
Lauren Harper
Lauren Harper Replied on Sept. 7, 2011

Thanks for the feedback! Right now the only way to tell it is a hyperlink is by the font color (hyperlinks are blue), and I tried to make it stand out by making it bold, but having it underlined would be nice. Thanks again!

0
Ashley Davies
Digital Marketing Manager, InterCall
Posted on Sept. 2, 2011
  • Recommended by:

I think that this all depends on the product/service that is on offer.

In the UK, it is typical of furniture and carpet stores to have 'massive' sales with heavily discounted prices. The problem with this is that the consumer is wise to these sales and just waits for the next one to role around, which is often only a month or two away.

0
Gary Ambrosino
President, Timetrade Systems
Posted on Sept. 2, 2011
  • Recommended by:

It works if there is REALLY a price increase coming. It doesn't work if the "price increase" is the elimination of a discount incentive - - that comes off as unilateral.

It works better for products that are "one off" sales, but not so well for products or services that are sold as part of an ongoing customer relationships where the customer might view the price increase urgency as a questionable sales topic.

0
Michael A Brown
President, BtoBEngage
Posted on Sept. 2, 2011
  • Recommended by:

There is little that marketers and sales people can do to change customers’ clocks or calendars. But oh my, do we ever try! For example, how many of us have attempted to shortcut customers' normal buying cycles? We trot out all the usual enticements: not only impending price increases, but also price cuts, incentives, rebates, extended credit, and so on, especially at months’ end. The objective: to get the business quickly by convincing prospects and customers to leapfrog what they normally do.

It sometimes works in the consumer realm but not often in BtoB. The reason: important business decisions take time. Sometimes we can expedite the purchase order once the "yes" decision is made, but seldom can we compress the hours and days of the consideration process itself.

0
Francine Allaire
Revenue Acceleration Strategist: Biz Dev | Alliances and Channels | Sales | Social Media, Revenue Acceleration Strategies
Posted on Sept. 2, 2011
  • Recommended by:

In a B2C sale it might work because consumers tend to be more impulsive buyers and it is not an organization decision involving multiple individuals. In a B2B sale, the decision is much more complex, involving many individuals/teams/departments (with sometimes conflicting agendas) and since price is often cited as the reason companies didn't buy from Company A but it is rarely the REAL reason why they didn't do so discounts, rebates, incentives rarely work to speed up the sale cycle... but what it does it set a new low for if and when the company ever buys from you. Go for building a solid relationship, establish trust and most of all demonstrate value to the buyer and you will in a much better shape then dropping your prices short of doing the former.

0
Matt Heinz
President, Heinz Marketing Inc
Posted on Sept. 2, 2011
  • Recommended by:

You can use pending price increases as a carrot. If you have prospects on the fence, locking in a lower price could get them over the hump. But if they were on the fence to begin with, they probably had already made up their mind to buy.

Price increases, of course, are very different from price discounts. Too many companies put their products and services "on sale" far too often, hoping it will generate more sales. But if your prospects get used to your frequent sales intended to drive urgency and activity, they'll end up having the exact opposite effect.

Offering a lower price will not inherently change the prospect's need for what you're selling. It won't change how they've prioritized the solution or its outcome in their organization. Get some buyers to commit who may or may not actually need or want your service, and you're setting yourself up for more expensive customer relationships, difficult deployments, higher churn, etc.

The best way to leverage pending price increases is with late-stage opportunities. Isolate the prospects who already have a need, already have urgency based on the inherent value and expected outcome of what you can provide, and get them to commit more quickly before the price goes up.

0
John McCoy
Solutions Architect, Perceptive Software
Posted on Sept. 2, 2011
  • Recommended by:

As an advisor on the enterprise purchasing side, I can tell you that these threats make little difference and generally ignored by seasoned decision makers. They're more like annoying background chatter.

After completing the important things like a business case, CBA, and proof of concept, the threat of a pending price increase can actually slow the procurement process. This is because decision makers can't know for sure that the amount they're budgeting will actually cover the cost of the product at the end of the process. It's important to remember that the purchasing process in an enterprise is often partially dependent on people who have no real interest or concern for the product itself.

0
Michael A Brown
Michael A Brown Replied on Sept. 2, 2011

John, your last sentence describes an increasingly common scenario, and it can damage enterprises in two ways:

• If price … or the purchasing process itself … becomes the chief determinant of source, the people who must install/use/enjoy/suffer the product or service within the organization must deal with the consequences of the lowest common denominator.

• If the lowest common denominator product or service fails to perform appropriately, then the company’s deliverables, customer service, brand/reputation, and stock value likely will be among the casualties.

Thank you for flagging this important aspect!

0
Richard Simpson
Richard Simpson Replied on Sept. 3, 2011

John your description is one I recognise, and the central point that creating uncertainty about the business case can, for very good reasons, be counter productive from a sales perspective is one all sales leaders should consider, before attempting to apply pressure of this type.

In my view the only way to avoid the situation is to ensure that the sales and marketing functions are delivering sufficient opportunities into the funnel such that the revenue delivery can take account of the customers business cycles as well as the company's business cycles. Most companies run with too little volume in the sales funnels and therefore try to force the customers that are in the funnel to perform unnatural acts to get the business through in the required period.

Michael you are right to flag this as a concern. However in my experience, where there is an imbalance in the influence between the business drivers and the buying arm in favour of the buying arm in well run business in the commercial world, it does tend to be very temporary. However, this is a very big problem in government business, both national and local, and is one of the many causes of the shocking history of very bad delivery in that sector.

Very best regards

Richard

0
Andrew Rudin
Andrew Rudin Replied on Sept. 6, 2011

I agree with Matt's comments on this one, but would like to add that pending price increases are an effective buying motivator--when they're done in the right way. I would also like to debunk the idea that there's something dishonest about using price increases as a buying lever. Not necessarily. (A purchasing agent who has just avoided a raw material increase by locking in a contract price is a hero, not a bum, and he or she will thank you for the information.)

A price increase backfires when it's mishandled. A vendor will be outed when an increase is hollow. Make deadlines stick. Provide reasons for the increase--market adjustment, raw material cost increases, labor cost increases

0
John McCoy
John McCoy Replied on Sept. 6, 2011

You bring up a good point Andrew. My comment is purely from the perspective of enterprise software and IT services. When making purchases of other types of products where true scarcity may exist, this tactic is somewhat less reprehensible :-D

Answer This Question