Share what you know with millions of people

Focus is the best place to turn what you know into remarkable content
×
0

What will be the next big consumer product to become obsolete?

Attachments

5
Barry Schaeffer
Principal Consultant, Content Life Cycle Consulting
Posted on Oct. 21, 2011

All of the answers already posted are good ones so I won't add my prognostications about what will be 'completely' obsolete.

What I do see coming however is a topping out of the currently frenzied market for high-end smart phones and PDA's. When you see a new iPhone come on the market and sell several million in the first week, you can bet that the appeal is more than a logical expansion of the market. It is instead most likely something akin to the CB craze of the early-mid 70s. I was part of that craze and watched as up to a million CB radios per week were being sold... to everyone at higher and higher prices. As the craze, begun with the novelty recording "Convoy" and the introduction of 40 channels, matured, buyers (like me I must admit) had to have the next big thing: PLL circuitry, crystal lattice filters, SWR meters, directional antennas and single sideband radios were just a few. Then there were the base sets (I had this fantastic Radio Shack base that could talk all over the world.) Some high end automobiles (Cadillac comes to mind) were even being sold with embedded CB transceivers.

So what happened? Well, the citizens band didn't go away; it just topped out so that the volume that made it so attractive to manufacturers dissipated, moving the industry and the market back to where it had started, truckers and enthusiasts. This happened well before digital and cell phone technology became available so it wasn't new technology that killed the mass market.

I believe that the smart phone and PDA market will undergo somewhat the same shakeout; not becoming obsolete but contracting to a more functional market driven by need rather than preference. That will put many of the industry's current players out of business.

0
Jake Jakubuwski
Jake Jakubuwski Replied on Oct. 23, 2011

Barry,
Overall I agree with you. From where I sit the current "gotta have" is driven by fashion more then functionality. Personally, I can testify to that as an eyewitness to pegged pants, bouffant hair dos, and even $20 ballpoint pens.
I think more than obsolescence we're seeing simple (Is there such a thing?) market change. Your CB analogy was an excellent example. How about the IBM Selectric? I was one of those that made a deal with the Devil in order to get one in my office...then the IBM Mag Card...

0
Barry Schaeffer
Barry Schaeffer Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

Nice to see there is still someone around who can remember all those great "new" technologies like Selectrics and MTSTs (for you younger generationers, that stands for "Magnetic Tape Selectric Typewriter". Then there are the silliness products like pet rocks and mood rings, etc.
I think that we can recognize here a basic (although uncodified) law of human nature that "the more exuberant the demand the more likely the shakeout." Manufacturers who ignore this "law" usually end up getting ground up by it unless they can position themselves as one of the surviving cadre.

0
Scott Albro
Scott Albro Replied on Oct. 27, 2011

I enjoyed the reference to the CB craze. Thanks for that.

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

WA State law still requires calling the Sheriff on CB to report accidents. Many Counties in Washington do not have cell service; need Satellite phones.
"Hula hoops" make a comeback every few years. Re: Caddie; you'd think piston engines, that were developed in the 1800s, would be obsolete by now.

3
Robert Keahey
IT, Business and Social Strategist/Commentator, SummaLogic LLC
Posted on Oct. 20, 2011

Maybe not the "next", but ultimately destined to be replaced by smart phones - the point and shoot digital camera.

0
Brian Phelps
Brian Phelps Replied on Oct. 21, 2011

I've been amazed at the quality of the photos from my 4S.

0
Paul Hook
Paul Hook Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

I was going to post this as my response but you said it the same way I would have—not sure it'll be next but cell phone camera quality is rapidly improving along with the fact that you always have your phone with you—no need to carry another device.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

Agree - the pocket computer will take photos, cameras, calculators, phones... away and integrate it all in one - including laptops and everything that has a CPU and can be carried around. It isn't actually the smart phone - it is the computer that just added the phone technology to it ;) same thing but a significant twist down the road.

3

The land-line telephone is rapidly becoming obsolete. Google Voice, Skype, cellphones, Ooma, Magic Jack are just some of the reasons. The high monthly cost is another.

2
Simon Robb
IT/IS Manager, KCGM`
Posted on Oct. 20, 2011

Possibly the calculator, they are built in to smartphones, tablets, why carry an extra device?

0
Brian Phelps
Brian Phelps Replied on Oct. 21, 2011

What about scientific or financial calculators? Those have specific job functions that smartphones and tablets don't satisfy.

0
Simon Robb
Simon Robb Replied on Oct. 21, 2011

if you click on view tab in a windows calculator, a scientific calculator is an option. Also their are hundreds of free apps that can perform these tasks for both Andriod and iphones / Pads.

So why carry an extra device!

0
Steven Romero
Steven Romero Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

Students are generally allowed to use scientific calculators to take tests - but they are not allowed to use smartphones - or even have them in their possession. My highschool sophomore son just purchased his second scientific calculator - at a whopping $15.

0
Simon Robb
Simon Robb Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

Good point, I'm surprised they still teach kids how to use them :) Maybe we could invent a tablet that can be locked down for exams etc.. that allows the student to answer the questions electronically and provides access to calculators or other tools only. Similar to the Microsoft test center exams! This would mean teaching students to type with more than 2 fingers / thumbs though!

2
Eric Lenington
CEO, FaxLogic, LLC
Posted on Oct. 23, 2011

While some of these products have already been named (like "snapshot" digital cameras and calculators), I think this marks a larger trend of integration. I believe it will affect any "stand alone" device that exists today that has a single purpose. One by one, these are being integrated into other devices, which at its foundation is really being driven by Moore's Law. There are lots of examples. Take stand-alone GPS devices. I'd say that we are almost on the verge of any good smart phone being a viable alternative to a dedicated GPS (barring certain specialized applications like construction or surveying). Another is XM radio. It's very common today to find that feature built in to the standard car radio, as opposed to needing a separate box/controller. "Snapshot" cameras, as already mentioned, are essentially already at the point of being absorbed by current smart phones, which is why I think you see the big players in this space starting to promote interchangeable lenses and better optical zoom, essentially moving their product upstream towards "professional" cameras. And in my industry, stand-alone fax machines (while still being produced by the millions) are slowly being integrated into multi-function "all in one" machines.

What all of these examples and the others mentioned have in common is that it has simply become very inexpensive to add the functionality--a GPS or XM radio receiver that used to require a handful of parts is now a single chip--driven by Moore's Law. That's not to say that everything that can be is a candidate for integration (who really wants a TV in their microwave?) But look around at the long list of "purpose-built" devices, and one by one, they will likely be absorbed.

One other thought on this topic: As broadband, wired and wireless, continues to improve, in speed, availability, and footprint, we will see a trend towards "cloud-supported" devices (i.e. devices or really functions of devices that are not done entirely in the device itself; instead, the "heavy lifting" is done in the cloud). One such example is Amazon's new Kindle Fire. By moving some of the processing requirements to the cloud, they were able to lower the cost of the device and presumably give it more capability that it could have otherwise supported. And yes, I know that they have been getting some funny looks from the pundits for this approach, but I expect others to follow this model. This is actually what my company does for fax machines, all-in-ones, and document scanners--we let them do the basic job of paper input/output, while putting the intelligence in the cloud.

0
Sandra Gustavsen
Sandra Gustavsen Replied on Oct. 28, 2011


I had the same thought, Eric, about the standalone GPS device becoming obsolete in the near future. As you mention, most high-end smartphones have this capability built-in. And, I imagine that most cars may soon have a built-in GPS as a standard feature.

2

In my opinion cable television as we know it is soon going to be passe, lot of technologies are playing a role in this and internet and streaming form a backbone of it.

At a more holistic level I think convergence is being overplayed, imagine a situation, a tablet, being used as a computing,communication, imaging device, being sold at $ 500, when I could have the luxury of similar/enhanced feature devices being available cumulatively at similar price points.

Mrinal Singh
twitter: mrinalasingh
Homepage: http://about.me/mrinal.singh
Blog: blogs.ittoolbox.com/emergingtech/trends/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mrinalsingha

0
Jake Jakubuwski
Jake Jakubuwski Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

As I mntioned earlier, I have seen radio give way to TV and clunky Bakelite telephones fall prey to cell phones. Technology, during my lifetime has increased exponentially and in the last decade has blossomed even faster. My take is this: We ain't seen nothin' yet! As technoology continues to grow, we can expact a lot of "false" starts and "crazes" but young people, today, that are entering college and are majoring in "Computer Sciences" (for lack of a better term) will find what they learn in their first year, or two, to be obsolete when they graduate in four years.
As far as the type, style or function of the device we use ten years from now, I haven't a clue. But I guarantee this: That generation of integrators will probably be having this same conversation!

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

Cable TV will fade because it is a poor value - a serial medium in a random-access, on-demand, anytime/anywhere world, funded by irritating commercials that now make up 30% of the volume of programming. Those of us who grew up with TV will probably continue to subscribe, but the next generation will bag it.

On the other hand, the cable companies aren't just going to hand out bandwidth to support all that on-demand Internet TV. Expect data-services prices to rise, even as cable TV prices do not fall.

2
Mark  Madden
Owner, Sharpening Technician, M & M Sharpening Services
Posted on Oct. 25, 2011

The Wristwatch. Who uses one nowadays? Everyone uses their phone.
CD-Roms are going the way of the floppy.
Land line phones at home.

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Oct. 25, 2011

- Rolex (et al) is jewelry; says "I'm important". Wristwatch is "dress up" like a suit and/or tie (or black turtleneck). Many watches are analog.
- Data retention of printed CD or DVD is ~100 years. Data retention specification of chips in your USB flash drive or SSD is 5 yrs for MLC and 10 years for SLC.
- Several Telecommuting services I've contacted require a land line. Home Depot credit card I filled out required a landline.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

I still have my Breguet No 3145 a piece of art I ware amybe 3 times a year. But yes, I don't ware a wrist watch since 2007 or so. :)

0
Chris Miller
Chris Miller Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

I have many watches. Today I am wearing my favorite - a Breitling Emergency with a yellow dial. Big brand jewelry will never become obsolete. I love Breitling because it has its own unique story and it is not flashy like a Rolex. Only other Breitling fans recognize and appreciate it. By the way - my emergency watch is the least functional pilots watch I have ever seen. There is a difference between needs and wants; we buy on emotion - I am not even a pilot.

0
Chris Miller
Chris Miller Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

It is far more likely we will one day have phones in our watches.

2
Axel Schultze
CEO, XeeMe Corp. - Social Presence Management
Posted on Oct. 27, 2011

Cell / smart phones will be the next consumer product that will be obsolete.

Apple never produced any phones, but always computers. That the iPhone is a phone is a simple illusion. Adding phone capabilities to a computer, is about 5% of the real estate of the CPU board. The real smart thing was to call it a phone :)

Nokia, RIM and a few others are the last smart phone manufacturer. They may cease operations in the next 5 or so years. Pocket style computers will dominate the tech world and do more than adding phone or audio capacity.

There are only a few people who have the capacity to do that: Dell, Oracle (SUN's CPU production), Siemens, Samsung.... and of course Apple. Whoever wants to seriously compete with Apple needs to "think different" when it comes to "smart phones" - because there is no smart phone but smart computers that supports audio as a side effect and transport that audio over an IP network - you may still call it a phone.

Axel
http://XeeMe.com/AxelS
(my entire social presence)

0
Brian Phelps
Brian Phelps Replied on Oct. 27, 2011

Well put Axel. I barely use my iPhone as a phone. It just happens to make phone calls if I need it to. Thanks for the insight.

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

1. Shrinking phone guts: Apple A4 (A5) cpus are stacked multichip modules. 3D Silicon is already here, phone the size of a Bluetooth headset; I just saw a Bt that fit in the ear canal.
2. Shrinking power needs: Brick phones had 2 watt power and 10 mile radius cells. New phones 300mW power throttled to 20mW to not bleed into next cell. FCC rules limit cellular frequency bands so cells need to shrink to accommodate user volume.
3. people are already being microchipped. Where do you want your phone implanted? (q.v. "Johnny Mnemonic").

1

It might be argued that the answering machine is already obsolete.

Next up, incandescent light bulbs.

1
Remy Bergsma
Community Manager, MailPlus
Posted on Oct. 21, 2011

High end pcs is my guess - simply because gaming is moving towards more specialized platforms that are quite powerful and have their own networks (Xbox, PS3, Wii etc) and for more casual gaming there are loads of smartphones and tablets (iPad anyone).

For regular office work, low end pcs will still exist, so maybe Bill Gates' prediction of a net computer (nc vs pc) will finally come true.

Computer work that still demands high end hardware like video editing, photo manipulation, 3D design and such is fast moving to the Mac platform, so the pc will lose there too.

On Robert's answer: the trouble is size, actually. Sensors in current smartphones are quite good, but too small to make nice pictures in other than the best circumstances. The bigger sensors in compacts need bigger lenses, which are not what the smartphone audience wants. Yes, some of the market will be gobbled up by smartphones, but definitely not everything.

0
Michael Hess
President/CEO, Skooba Design
Posted on Oct. 21, 2011
  • Recommended by:

Since you specifically said "big" consumer product I am going to be a bit bold and say the laptop computer (at least as we know it). Laptop sales have been on a steady decline as mobile devices and tablets increasingly dominate the market. As these devices become increasingly powerful and sophisticated--and as texting increasingly eats away at e-mail as a primary form of communication--there are fewer and fewer reasons to carry and use laptops.

There will always be some people and applications for which laptops are best-suited, but those numbers are already decreasing and the market reflects it. What remains of the traditional laptop market will likely, largely morph into more of a "dumb/client" machine scenario, thanks to the increasing availability and speed of wireless (including on airplanes) and cloud computing. There will be almost no reason for hard drives or any other form of storage, to the point where the only real value of a laptop is a full-sized, mechanical keyboard for typing-intensive work.

If you think this is an extreme and unrealistic prediction, remember that many companies suffered irreversibly when digital imaging came around. Even industry leaders and "experts" assumed it was years or decades away, and that the quality would never match silver-based film, but within less than 5 years the traditional photo market was already vanishing. The legendary Kodak (based a few miles down the road from me) is teetering on bankruptcy, in no small part due to its massive dependence on obsolete technology and its failure to change and keep up with evolution. The point being that there are a precedents for hard-to-believe predictions coming true, and quickly.

In this case I predict that within a similar 5-year window or less, the traditional laptop market will exist, but as a niche on the verge of market share irrelevance.

As someone whose business is very much tied to the laptop market, this affects me in a very real way, but we are already evolving and adapting to these changes as the trend has already begun and the handwriting is very much on the wall.

0
T. Scott Gross
author, T Scott Gross & Co., Inc.
Posted on Oct. 21, 2011
  • Recommended by:

customer service as a part of the bundle is the next consumer product to become obsolete... consumers will cut service out of the deal unless it is service worth paying for.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

Hah - interesting thought but I don't think so for one reason. The next smaller company or startup will through it just to compete. And win and others will follow until those startups can't afford it any more. See airline industry, auto industry...

0
  • Recommended by:

The plastic credit card will disappear and your phone will pay for everything.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

I like this one, but it will take a long time for the infrastructure to be put in place. So this isn't going to happen anytime soon. But at least they'll have an opportunity to get authentication right and reduce fraud enormously - see my blog at http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/pci-should-focus-real-problem for more.

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Oct. 25, 2011

This is happening in civilized countries (not the US). "Guest workers" in Europe are using GSM phone accounts to transfer funds back to their home countries, mostly to avoid fees (corruption of 3rd world states) from wiring money. EU standards pretty much eliminated the unencrypted "magnetic stripe" of US credit cards in favor of encrypted SIM based RFID ("PayPass") cards. Although news reports make a big deal of PayPass credit card numbers being gleaned by thieves walking around malls with RFID scanners, only lowlifes like porn or gambling sites accept CC# only, and those charges are easily challenged.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

Yeph - good one - it's happening in Europe and Asia and 3rd world countries like US and Africa will follow soon (sorry - couldn't resist ;)

0
Satrina Brandt
Human Resources Manager, Civil Contractors Federation
Posted on Oct. 23, 2011
  • Recommended by:

The lap top computer. They have always been too heavy and bulky and can mostly be replaced by a tablet. Also, I think hard disk drives (as everyone moves to the cloud) and as others have said the landline phone. Also, there needs to be integration of technology in our lounge rooms. There are too many options at the moment with DVD players, PVRs and then separate devices for movies (such as Apple TV) - it's too sloppy. I think large coffee machines in houses will also be a passing fad as people get fed up with cleaning and maintainng them.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

The laptop (more properly today, the notebook PC) will not be replaced by the tablet. There will continue to be a need for "real" operating systems and physical, full-size keyboards. We can, of course, add these to tablets, but then we have the notebook.

I'd love to see the DVR/PVR disappear into the cloud. But the cable companies, with the possible exception of FiOS, do not have the bandwidth to support this mode of operation. Regardless, everything that can be in the cloud or on the network should be in the cloud or on the network.

As for coffee, will Keurig own the market?

0
Rob Stevenson
Rob Stevenson Replied on Oct. 29, 2011

I'd give you a thumbs up on lap tops but thumbs down on disks or coffee machines. I own one of those big ones - I'll never give up on "her" :)

0
Paul Callanan
Director, JANSTON PtyLtd.,
Posted on Oct. 23, 2011
  • Recommended by:

I agree that the Hard Disc is going, going gone, alone with the Computer Room, Real Estate to service that Computer Room and the associated Staffing requirement of same = the recession we have to have, just around the corner awaiting us in "THE CLOUD".

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

Hard disk? Do you mean "magnetic media"? Have you read the technical specifications of Solid State Disks? The drives are rated at 150 years Mean Time Before Failure but the technical specs on the Flash Memory is 5 years data retention on MLC and 10 years data retention on SLCs. Re future, semiconductors are hitting the quantum limit and magnetic media hasn't. Historically the amount of data per user continues to rise at a rate faster than Moore's law (the 2MB mailbox has become 25GB and even that is cramped). Even Virtualized servers based on Tesla are limited by 2D interconnects possible on Silicon's surface: still requiring a Datacenter.
And go ahead and bet your business on "the cloud". I've never been able to get a solid guarantee from any so called cloud provisioner.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

I believe it was 1987 when hard drives were declared dead - and ever since they grew. Just saw a 2" drive with a 1 Terra byte capacity. The theoretic borderline these days even unsubstantiated: 100 Terra byte on a 1" single disc or 1 Peta byte on a drum of the size smaller than a coke can. Cost: $500 Nope - not going away any soon.

0
  • Recommended by:

I agree with Satrina:
The Lap Top computer
The landline phone (mine are all in the cupboard already)
The coffee maker, certainly! What a joke - use a plunger!
Also one that hasn't been mentioned -
The CD/DVD for entertainment (and probably for loading software as well). For 2 reasons:
1) so unreliable, reminds me of the cassette tape
2) no user control of videos - the movie studios have taken over control of the DVD format - user has to sit through all their garbage, can't fast forward etc the way you can watching the same movie on a media player from a thumb drive.

0
STEPHEN MUDAWARIMA
MANDEL TRAINING CENTRE
Posted on Oct. 24, 2011
  • Recommended by:

In the Developing world we are only just beginning to embrace some of the technologies you have already deemed obsolute. I do agree that the PC will become more and more irrelevant as hand held devices become more powerful.

0
Brian Phelps
Brian Phelps Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

I do agree that handhelds are becoming powerful and can replace PCs for many tasks. But could you imagine an animator at Pixar using an iPad to create Toy Story 5? Some tasks aren't ready to be taken over by handheld devices.

0
  • Recommended by:

As usage and data increase exponentially the wireless "Cloud" will hit the bandwidth wall unless the FCC changes its pro-carrier anti-consumer policies. This includes allowing carriers to subsidize wireless and internet services robbing user of "obsolete" services like land lines, frame relay, dark fiber, etc. The Internet "Cloud" has already experienced bandwidth reduction during peak usage events (like the Super Bowl toilet flush issue)(or trying to call at New Year midnight). Of course the failure of our government to provide public Internet access to its citizens is overshadowed by an electrical grid that is rusting to pieces (no power, no cloud) and exploding gas pipelines. Thank God these energy and communications companies are privatized. (Of course some problems like Cell Tower density are NIMBYs in wealthier neighborhoods; its OK to run a power line through a ghetto. ) These are Political problems whose resolution is in favor of those with cash to bribe our politicians. Of course since the Tea Party, lobbying (bribing) politicians has reached new levels. Graft will never be obsolete in our present system.

0
Bill McChesney
IT Executive, Large federal systems integration firm
Posted on Oct. 25, 2011
  • Recommended by:


The # 2 pencil! Starting this fall, the Indiana Department of Education will no longer require Indiana's public schools to teach cursive writing. I thought this gave way to “keyboarding” until twitter came along. I think my wife is now a co-twitterer and we are now twitterpated with abbreviations we simply don’t understand.

So, I think the absence of writing and sentence structure in favor of 140 byte bursts will obviate the pencil.

0
Holly Simmons
Holly Simmons Replied on Oct. 27, 2011

Say it ain't so! I love using a pencil, it's my go-to writing/sketching tool.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

THis is likely progress, with new technologies replacing the old. We won't even need to write our signatures in the future, as electronic authentication improves. I can't read my own writing as it is, so this can't happen soon enough for me...

0
Holly Simmons
Partner, Chickle Designs
Posted on Oct. 27, 2011
  • Recommended by:

How about big box stores. The internet has transformed the way consumers shop, and with the adoption of smartphones this is only going to continue.

Internet shopping delivers value on many fronts: convenience, product ratings, free shipping directly to my home, hassle free returns, live support, and the added bonus of recommended products based on my previous purchased. Wow -- internet shopping has come a long way in 5 years!

We will have no need for big box stores in a decade.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

You may be right - I buy almost everything I need online, although it's nice to be able to visit a big-box hardware store for plumbing and electrical supplies, etc. We also have 6,000 years of culture around going shopping in the real world, so I don't think this will be out of our genes anytime soon... And many big-box retailers have become bargain-basement outlets, with very competitive prices and instant gratification, that last point being critical. Again, such may be genetic at this point...

0
  • Recommended by:

Watches - no one needs them anymore with phones and other devices providing this. I would also suggest paper calendars...

0
Brian Phelps
Brian Phelps Replied on Oct. 27, 2011

Watches as a time piece may become obsolete. But most watches are worn as fashion pieces. The won't become obsoleted for this reason. Unless Rolex starts making gold iPhones, which is doubtful.

0
Bob Phibbs
The Retail Doctor®, The Retail Doctor
Posted on Oct. 28, 2011
  • Recommended by:

battery chargers for phones, tools, etc.

0
Brian Phelps
Brian Phelps Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

What will cause these to become obsolete? Why? How?

0
Bob Phibbs
Bob Phibbs Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

Clarification - plug-in chargers. Wireless transmission of power means your gadget will charge just from putting it on top of it or from a central hub in the home.

0
Mark Williams
Major Accounts Executive, Ricoh Americas Corporation
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

In short, anything cabled. We are heading into a completely wireless future. I also believe that, just as today we have wireless devices that require a cable to charge them, in the future there will be no need for even these...kind of like Power-Over-Ethernet that we have now, but without the cable medium. It's only logical.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

I disagree - just look at all the wire required to hook all those wireless devices together! And consider all the stationary devices and users who can benefit from wire. And remember, each wire is its own piece of bandwidth - we end up sharing the relatively small amount of spectrum available for commercial applications, albeit with reuse over distance. Still, even as a long-time wireless guy, my advice has always been: if you can use wire, you should use wire. And wire will be with us in many applications for many years to come.

And the inverse for wireless power - that won't really be practical anytime soon.

0
Mark Williams
Mark Williams Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

To a certain degree, and as it relates to the very near future maybe) I agree...but one thing is for certain and that is that we are moving to a wireless age, the only question is the time factor...7 years, 10 years...but we will absolutely get there. As things are right now, yes I agree that a wired connection is without question the way to go...but I still say things will be very different in the not-so-distant future.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

Hard to imagine - again, spectrum is limited, so both the technology and the economics are unfavorable here. We will see advances in MIMO and other technologies that improve spectral efficiency to some degree, but the other laws-of-physics radio-propagation artifacts of radio (e.g., fading of various forms, interference, etc.) will always be present, and wire just doesn't suffer from these. Wireless is the way to go when wire cannot be physically or economically (i.e., where wireless is cheaper) installed or where mobility is a requirement. Other than that, if you can use wire, you should use wire.

0
Nipun Jethi
Director of Product, Focus
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

Televisions as we've known them for 50+ years. One-way mass broadcast mediums with a complexity of peripherals (remotes, cable boxes, etc.).

They will become these intelligent devices that give us what they know we'll like. Their primary purpose will still be about entertaining us but they'll be personalized with endless content from the net. They'll be simplified, likely pushed forward by whatever design treatment Apple gives its new TV.

0
Brian Chamberlain
ERP and IT Strategy Consultant and Trainer, Answers 4 Business
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

Not sure if this qualifies, as they are most likely already obsolete, but watches of any variety are on the hit list. We all carry electronics that know the time - why wear one?

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

I love the simplicity of modern watches, and the fact that it's strapped to my wrist and thus hard to misplace. I wear a Casio that is solar-powered and automatically syncs to an atomic clock. I may give it up when it breaks, but I'm not counting on that anytime soon. The straps do give out, but Casios are very reliable (and very inexpensive). Standard disclaimer - I have no relationship with Casio other than as a long-time customer.

0
Don Fitchett
President, Business Industrial Network (Veteran Owned)
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

This may be off topic, but I thought the PC was supposed to replace the FAX machine. Wish it would hurry up, so everyone can reduce their carbon footprint a little more and become more green then using paper that goes straight from fax to trash. :) I would at least expect our Government and Schools to be smart enough to know digital fax is more secure, cheaper and greener. :/

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

I do occasionally have to send a fax to some techno-neanderthal or because of legal requirements (I prefer to scan documents and create pdfs, and then e-mail them). But I receive faxes via a virtual phone number and e-mail - no new paper created.

I do hope faxing disappears entirely, and it will - but this is likely to take another decade. Big installed bases don't disappear overnight...

0
Don Fitchett
Don Fitchett Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

:) I like your choice of words.

0
Mark Williams
Major Accounts Executive, Ricoh Americas Corporation
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

@Don. I haven't faxed a document in 7 years. I use the PC for everything...efax, scan and email, etc.

0
Don Fitchett
Don Fitchett Replied on Oct. 31, 2011

Good for you Mark, the world needs more like you. :)

0
Bill Wood
President, R3Now Consulting
Posted on Oct. 31, 2011
  • Recommended by:

While it will take some time I am guessing that it will be two products for the West and one for much of the world.

The smartphone and the laptop...

===========

The "pads" are co-opting both platforms to one degree or another but these are still in their early iterations. As soon as one of the major vendors bridges the gap between the real business computing power to replace the laptop and manages to integrate far more phone and calling features the "pads" (iPad, Android, etc.) will begin to make the smartphone and the laptop obsolete.

This will not happen overnight. Even if that blockbuster product were available today, it would still likley take a few years. But that day I believe is coming.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

Smartphones have a convenient pocket-sized form factor, so it's not likely any other current product could replace them. As for the other device, it's possible tablets will replace laptops/notebooks if they get more appropriate operating systems and decent physical keyboards - in which case they'd be laptops! A tablet can indeed replace a laptop when content consumption is the main mission - but not for content creation, at least not now.

0
Bill Wood
Bill Wood Replied on Nov. 2, 2011

Thanks Craig for the insight, but I'm still standing by my future state. Since I am personally a hard core "road warrior" as part of my job I can absolutely guarantee you that a nextgen "pad" (different than today's pads) which includes telephony would be huge draw for me and my colleagues. As I mentioned in my post if such a device were available today it would still take a few years.

Either way, I'm still predicting that the cell phone and the laptop will both be outdated.

As a last resort, applying Moore's law, the size of the phone electronics will lead to a phone little more than the size of your bluetooth headphone device in a few years.

So, one way or another the cell phone replacement is coming, and coming fairly soon. The replacement for the laptop is coming as well. The first company to figure this out will be the winner in the computer and cell phone wars.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 3, 2011

The cell phone handset (a/k/a PDA) form factor will be with us for a very long time. While the phone can indeed be reduced to the size of a Bluetooth headset, the display cannot (unless we discover how to input images directly to the brain, bypassing the front end of human visual processing. That's not going to happen anytime soon.

A tablet with a keyboard is a laptop. It's just a question of operating system at that point. I don't think we'll eliminate keyboards anytime soon either.

BTW - I use Wi-Fi to tether my notebook and/or tablet to the handset, sharing the cellular connection. This really saves on cost as there's no need for yet another data plan.

0
Bill Wood
Bill Wood Replied on Nov. 3, 2011

With the proliferation of "pad" devices over the next 3 to 5+ years the cell phone display (or PDA display if you like) will become completely redundant. Why do I need the same apps, the more *limited* processing (as compared to pads), on a visually smaller device? Pad devices are already becoming ubiquitous and have greater power than PDA type cell phones. Over the next couple of years as processor power in Pads increases and the hardware is improved and mass produced the cell phone as we know it will not just move toward redundance but soon thereafter obsolescence in the form it is today.

0
Gertjan Vlug
CEO, BIReady
Posted on Nov. 1, 2011
  • Recommended by:

I hope the smartphones will be obsolete soon. Giving your attention to people around you in stead of people not present would almost lead to human behavior.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

I don't think smartphones are in any danger of obsolescence - they will be with us for a long time. But they've not exactly, as you note, augmented good manners, which really are on the decline. And don't get me started on the safety issue - it would seem the phones have much more intelligence than many of their users!

0
Mark Williams
Mark Williams Replied on Nov. 1, 2011

I'm afraid human behavior may be a thing of the past already. People find it ever more difficult to interact with others of the species if it's not via some electronic device...not to mention the total degradation of the English language (IMO, LOL) I was discussing this very thing last night and could not even think of the last time I actually hand wrote something. Technology is a good thing in some ways but can be a double-edged sword with some very disturbing possible outcomes.

0
DINO BEALS
Financial Advisor, Canfin Financial Group
Posted on Nov. 8, 2011
  • Recommended by:

It seems with live chat, texting, email,teleconferencing,webcam,Webinars, online banking and the like the personal touch is becoming obsolete. Hardly anyone wants to talk with you on the phone or meet with you in person.Your clients want to email or text, your companies want to meet via webinar and teleconferencing and your family and friends want to chat online via messenger or facebook.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Nov. 8, 2011

How true, and a bit sad. I learned a long time ago (but not really long enough ago) that business is about people; everything else is incidental. But we're on the way to reducing business to a bunch of black boxes interacting with one another - think Amazon. See what you want, click, and a series of interacting black boxes dump a real box on your doorstep. The real-world social aspect of shopping thus vanishes.

I hate to say this, but technology changes us as beings and it may very well not be for the better over the long run. It's not just about the result when it comes to people - the process is important as well.

0
Michael A Brown
Michael A Brown Replied on Nov. 8, 2011

Mr. Beals, you are correct. As a society, we have inadvertently allowed ourselves to become shadows of our real selves by over-relying on electrons to “define” who we are to others. And yet a few things preserve the human element …

Social media networking still works best once one has actually been social.

People still go to Europe live and in-person even though they can “tour” Europe on line. The visceral human experience trumps screen images every time.

When we do meet people face-to-face, it can be cause for delight and rejoicing. This is true equally in our personal and business lives.

The main difference seems to be that nowadays we have to earn the right to do what most of us actually want … to interact as genuine people. That’s a shame, but I do perceive that we may be coming around to realize and reassert our human v. artificial values.

-1
Dennis Bryan
Consultant, WBC Pharmacies Inc
Posted on Oct. 24, 2011

My response to all the responses so far, is I agree with all, so just look up to the "cloud". All you will need is an access point, and today it will be a "tablet type device" tomorrow who knows, maybe a cranial implant? Just watch your latest syfi show for your next answer, and you will find it. As we know now, technology expands expodenially, and it has. So find something that meets your needs, and enjoy it, for something new is right around the corner.

0
Stephen Jacks
Stephen Jacks Replied on Oct. 25, 2011

Like the movie "Johnny Mnemonic"
A high tech employer offers their employees a bonus if they agree to be "Microchipped" (RFID).

-1
  • Recommended by:

I think you missed my logic re Facebook. I feel like I'm explaining a joke.

MySpace was purchased for 580 million, valued at 12 Billion in 2007 (higher web rank than Google), sold (ditched) for 35 million in 2011. Facebook eclipsed MySpace in 2008. (LinkedIn has a business networking model that doesn't involve sex or stalking you ex. Social sites are not identical but stock analysts won't consider that.)
Several dissapointing IPOs in this depression, but social site Linked in was relatively successful at $9 billion. Zuckerberg "invented" Facebook after Friendster and MySpace. Facebook has 1/4 of the CTR (click thru rate) of MySpace, and one-fifth the number of clicks compared to those on the Web as a whole; and most of its demographic is outside the desired 25-49 year olds. Although Facebook has adequate income to continue operations, there is a strong capitalist incentive for the owners to cash in (before its too late). (And note that Facebook's growth is slowing even before the "cool has run out".)
If the high expectations for a Facebook IPO are not met (currently valued at $ ~45 billion), the 850 million users be damned, Facebook's business model will be a failure with the ensuing consequences.
You are correct that it will still be "popular" for a few years after that. However as a failed business model, like MySpace, it too will fade away.
The contest will be between Google Plus and Microsoft Live.
And, bless Steve Jobs, iLife.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 27, 2011

I'm still missing it Stephen
- MySpace was successful until purchase it flopped for many reasons including wrong owner, wrong management, wrong vision - which all had nothing to do with MySpace or their founders. That can happen to ANY company any time any where.

- CTR is not a success pattern but a metric. Mercedes has 1/2 the production capacity then GM - not sure about you but I have a clear idea what stock I'd buy. ;)

- FB will of course slow down as it reaches saturation. But it doubles revenue at a $B rate - not bad - actually never seen before ;)

- A failed IPO would be one thing the business model is an entirely different thing.

- Is MS LIfe still around. I thought it was shot down. I like G+ and very much hope it can stay alive so there is at least one more contender - but at current rate of development (not talking users) zero chance - unfortunately.

-1
Bruce Hoag
Work Psychologist & Business Coach, Dr Bruce Hoag
Posted on Oct. 28, 2011
  • Recommended by:

Employers. This is difficult to understand in the current economic climate, but there is a critical shortage of skilled workers. When the economy improves, this will become more apparent. You'll see more entrepreneurs, more home-based businesses, and more hobbies that become businesses.

People are fed up with big business, and big executives with big paychecks. Who'd want to help them get bigger by working for them?:

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

I tend to agree with you (I did exactly this 20 years ago and haven't looked back), but I think you may be overstating the opportunity just a bit. Being an entrepreneur involves skills we really don't teach in school - marketing, sales, management, and this in addition to expertise in one's chosen area of service. I suppose we could offer such education on a larger scale, but even then putting the entrepreneurial life into practice is far from easy. There are many, many long days, and one must forget the 9-5 lifestyle. A popular saying: I'm an entrepreneur: I get to work any 80 hours a week I want. This is so true.

Don't get me wrong; the rewards are potentially great, but I suspect that many will simply opt for the efficiency that comes with being an employee. Such is part of our culture. OK, so is entrepreneuring. But one represents a path of least resistance that will prove optimal for the vast (I suspect) majority, just as has always been the case.

Besides - who will all those entrepreneurs hire, anyway?

0
Bruce Hoag
Bruce Hoag Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

It's true that being an entrepreneur requires a variety of skills, but I haven't met one yet that assessed them personally before launching off into some sort of enterprise. Instead, they all just leaped into the foray, and learned the rest as they went along.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 28, 2011

Well, you've met one now. And your observation may explain why the vast majority of new ventures fails.

-1
rahul meher
CEO,CFO,VP,Director, Leon Computers Pvt. Ltd.
Posted on Oct. 28, 2011
  • Recommended by:

WRIST WATCH,
I rearly use from last 3-4 years, Smart Phone has got everything.

-2
  • Recommended by:

Facebook.
After the successful LinkedIn IPO, Facebook will fall flat on overblown expectations.
Like MySpace.

0
Craig Mathias
Craig Mathias Replied on Oct. 24, 2011

Nope - Facebook will continue to drain personal productivity for many years into the future. It appeals to both narcissism as well as convincing people that they really can make a difference even when they don't. People still visit Fantasyland at Disneyland; Facebook is the same thing.

0
Axel Schultze
Axel Schultze Replied on Oct. 26, 2011

ha ha ha - yeah right 850 Million FB users will join the hardly 100 Million LinkedIn user to read the spam they are sooo missing since Facebook :)
Sorry Stephen just couldn't resist.

I have LinkedIn Nr 8573 or so - but sorry LI is just not keeping up and will never catch up. :( The dominate three are Facebook 850 Million, Twitter 200 Million and GooglePlus if they turn the ship around - if not I'm afraid we have another monopoly soon (Microsoft) (ATT)....

Answer This Question